<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>District Lies &#187; album reviews</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theobscurist.com/muzyka/category/album-reviews/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theobscurist.com/muzyka</link>
	<description>A showblog/journal/diary, mainly taking place in Washington, DC</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 01:11:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Imperial China : Phosphenes</title>
		<link>http://theobscurist.com/muzyka/2010/01/imperial-china-phosphenes/</link>
		<comments>http://theobscurist.com/muzyka/2010/01/imperial-china-phosphenes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 22:17:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jeff gerhard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[album reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[imperial china]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theobscurist.com/muzyka/?p=239</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Of all the DC bands I&#8217;ve paid attention to over the years, Imperial China is my least-favorite name since Q and Not U (whose name I have complained about publically here). Much like their unfortunately-appellated predecessors, the band-name turn-off kept me from checking out Imperial China for a long time, though I started to hear [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://theobscurist.com/muzyka/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/ic.jpg" alt="phosphenes" title="phosphenes" width="319" height="319" /></p>
<p>Of all the DC bands I&#8217;ve paid attention to over the years, <strong>Imperial China</strong> is my least-favorite name since <strong>Q and Not U</strong> (whose name I have complained about publically <a href="http://monodrone.org/?p=95">here</a>).  Much like their unfortunately-appellated predecessors, the band-name turn-off kept me from checking out Imperial China for a long time, though I started to hear things about them a while ago.  I finally caught them <a href="http://theobscurist.com/muzyka/2009/07/imperial-china-fort-reno-7909/">live last summer</a>, and in a way I&#8217;m sorry to have missed out on them over the past couple of years &#8212; but based on <em>Phosphenes</em> I don&#8217;t have to really worry about it, because they seem like a band that is just starting to gel.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s the thing about the album (coming out in February via Sockets/Ruffian): it&#8217;s very good, but not very easy to get into.  Nowadays it is hard to summon the patience to absorb a whole album by a band you don&#8217;t already know, let alone one like <em>Phosphenes</em> that comes with a few features likely to make too many listeners click the &#8220;next&#8221; button.  Musically, things are only slightly difficult.  Imperial China offer up a very good-sounding mix of basic rock instruments and electronics, reminiscent at times of bands like <strong>Battles</strong> or the electronica of recent tastemaker-faves <strong>Fuck Buttons</strong>.  The songs are sinewy and tense, tight but short on hooks, rarely too concerned about rocking out.  This isn&#8217;t NPR rock, but it isn&#8217;t really extreme, either.   The recording sounds great, although, as a guitarist, I must say that the only instrument that really stands out is the guitar, which isn&#8217;t too technically complicated, but sure has awesome effects.  The electronics are pretty solid, occasionally adding unexpected twists like <strong>Radiohead</strong>-esque chilly background drones in &#8220;Letter of a General&#8221; and unsettling chimes on &#8220;The Last Starfighter&#8221; that remind me of the weird &#8220;<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eB7Z9xa6g74">Lullaby version of <strong>Tool</strong></a></em>&#8221; that my brother once used as a rough soundtrack to a film.  It&#8217;s also pretty well steeped in DC rock tradition, from <strong>Fugazi</strong> to <strong>Frodus</strong>, and bears a lot of hallmarks of producer Devin Ocampo (from <strong>Faraquet/Medications</strong>/etc.).</p>
<p>Musically and sonically, <em>Phosphenes</em> grabbed me right away, but the thing that took me a few listens to come around to was the vocals.  It&#8217;s not that they&#8217;re bad at all, but I think they are an acquired taste.  On my first listen to the album, my favorite song was an instrumental, &#8220;Mortal Wombat.&#8221;  The singing is just trying to do way too much, and the songs depend too much on vocals that aren&#8217;t as good as the music.  The singing sounds best at its most melodic, as on the other first-listen highlight, the pop song of the record, &#8220;Go Where Airplanes Go.&#8221;  Whereas the vocals are at their worst when they are kind of spat-out and shouted, as on the opening track, &#8220;All That Is Shouted.&#8221;  </p>
<p>But what I realized after a couple listens was that the singing, while not amazing, is actually doing a lot of very cool things.  There is D. Boon-style patter on &#8220;Invincible,&#8221; Tim Harrington hollering on &#8220;Bananamite,&#8221; and creepy crooning on &#8220;A Modern Life&#8221; that sounds an awful lot like singer/winemaker Maynard James Keenan.  It&#8217;s pretty fun to notice this stuff, and I gradually came around a bit to the vocals, on the whole.  The lyrics seem about what you&#8217;d expect from this kind of music, all quite appropriate for a DC band.  (And by the way it is nice to just think that there are &#8220;DC bands&#8221; in the heritage of the &#8217;90s scene that I loved so much.)</p>
<p>I hope enough people can get past mildly-challenging music and mildly-weak vocals to listen to the whole record, because it is nicely arranged into a whole.  The whole thing twists and teases, keeping you on a sinister edge, refusing to really lead you anywhere.  It&#8217;s deliberately frustrating.  Even the killer closer track, &#8220;Letter of a General,&#8221; starts to build up and build up in traditional rock and roll style, then &#8212; well &#8212; sort of deflates.  This isn&#8217;t an album that is interested in just giving out rewards &#8212; you have to earn them through a little work of your own.  I can appreciate that, and hopefully some other people will too, because this is one of the better albums by local bands to come out in the past few years.</p>
<p>Here are my favorite songs&#8230; enjoy, and go see this band when you can, and here is their <a href="http://www.myspace.com/imperialchina">myspace page</a> where you can support them and buy stuff.</p>
<p><a href="http://theobscurist.com/i/02MortalWombat.mp3">Download audio file (02MortalWombat.mp3)</a></p>
<p><a href="http://theobscurist.com/i/07GoWhereAirplanesGo.mp3">Download audio file (07GoWhereAirplanesGo.mp3)</a></p>
<p><a href="http://theobscurist.com/i/09LetterofaGeneral.mp3">Download audio file (09LetterofaGeneral.mp3)</a></p>
<p>P.S. if you don&#8217;t know what &#8220;phosphenes&#8221; are, look it up.  This is a cool word, and I wonder how long it&#8217;s been on the band&#8217;s radar.  I kinda wish the <em>band</em> was called Phosphenes instead of the album&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://theobscurist.com/muzyka/2010/01/imperial-china-phosphenes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://theobscurist.com/i/02MortalWombat.mp3" length="8069722" type="audio/mpeg" />
<enclosure url="http://theobscurist.com/i/07GoWhereAirplanesGo.mp3" length="8304205" type="audio/mpeg" />
<enclosure url="http://theobscurist.com/i/09LetterofaGeneral.mp3" length="9232073" type="audio/mpeg" />
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
