<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>District of Cacophony &#187; sockets</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theobscurist.com/muzyka/tag/sockets/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theobscurist.com/muzyka</link>
	<description>A showblog/journal/diary, mainly taking place in Washington, DC</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2011 19:19:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Sockets Showcase @ Black Cat, 1/22/10</title>
		<link>http://theobscurist.com/muzyka/2010/02/sockets-showcase-black-cat-12210/</link>
		<comments>http://theobscurist.com/muzyka/2010/02/sockets-showcase-black-cat-12210/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 23:19:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jeff gerhard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big gold belt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[buildings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cornel west theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hume]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[imperial china]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sockets]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theobscurist.com/muzyka/?p=267</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So last month I was waxing enthusiastic about the Sockets showcase at the Black Cat, and I went and brought a bunch of friends. And it was great! But I got a little burned out on all-Sockets, all-the-time music thinking, and so I&#8217;m just getting around to writing it up. It was a solid show, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So last month I was <a href="http://theobscurist.com/muzyka/2010/01/sockets-showcase/">waxing enthusiastic</a> about the Sockets showcase at the Black Cat, and I went and brought a bunch of friends.  And it was great!  But I got a little burned out on all-Sockets, all-the-time music thinking, and so I&#8217;m just getting around to writing it up.  </p>
<p>It was a solid show, all 5 bands were good, and the whole night had a lot of good vibes.  There was a nice turnout and a lot of enthusiasm for the music.  And I talked to members of several of the bands, discussed things with my friends&#8230; it was all that I hoped for, really. </p>
<p>(I didn&#8217;t take photos or anything, so I am borrowing/stealing a bunch of photos from flickr user Paul Frederiksen.  You can see his photos of the showcase <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/vxsarin/sets/72157623141104421/">via flickr here</a>.)</p>
<p>As for the bands, well, let&#8217;s see.  Up first was <strong>Big Gold Belt</strong>.  This was the band I knew the least about coming into the show.  I thought they were pretty great, though.  It was mostly electronic stuff, with a chick singing who dressed and pranced a little like a drag queen, and a dude playing guitar over the electronic noise, perhaps just to make it look a little more like live music.  I was reminded vaguely of bands like <strong>Glass Candy &#038; the Shattered Theatre</strong>, or &#8217;80s electro stuff that I don&#8217;t know too well.  I would listen to them more.  I wasn&#8217;t sure they were locally based, but I said hello to the singer at some point in the night and she said they did live here.  But then their <a href="http://www.myspace.com/biggoldbelt">myspace</a> says Brooklyn.  So who knows &#8212; they sound like they should be from Brooklyn, though.  They were the least rocking band of the night but I think they went over pretty well, and it was nice to have them play as a change-up from the guitar rock.  In some ways they were even the most interesting, but I am not a huge fan of watching electronic music live, even with an attractive/weird singer.  So probably good that they were the opener.</p>
<p>Here are a couple of Frederksen&#8217;s photos of Big Gold Belt:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/vxsarin/4297239328/in/set-72157623141104421/"><img src="http://theobscurist.com/images/biggoldbelt1.jpg" alt="Big Gold Belt" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/vxsarin/4297239140/in/set-72157623141104421/"><img src="http://theobscurist.com/images/biggoldbelt2.jpg" alt="Big Gold Belt" /></a></p>
<p>Second was <strong>Buildings</strong>, who were my favorite of the night.  I think this is a pretty sweet band, though I didn&#8217;t think their performance was as good as <a href="http://theobscurist.com/muzyka/2009/10/buildings-haydees-92409/">the previous time I saw them</a>.  Also, they didn&#8217;t even play my favorite song of theirs that I know (it&#8217;s called &#8220;Now&#8221;).  I&#8217;m definitely a fan.  They are opening up for <strong>Magik Markers</strong> soon which would be a pretty rad show, though I think I&#8217;ll be out of town.</p>
<p>Buildings:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/vxsarin/4297255038/in/set-72157623141104421/"><img src="http://theobscurist.com/images/bldgs1.jpg" alt="Buildings" /></a></p>
<p>Then came <strong>Imperial China</strong>.  They were playing for their record release, and they were all in the news around that time (and good reviews are still coming out for <em>Phosphenes</em>), so a lot of people were probably there to see them specifically.  And they put on a good show.  Since I had just been <a href="http://theobscurist.com/muzyka/2010/01/imperial-china-phosphenes/">listening to their album a bunch of times</a> that same week, I was comparing their live performance to the CD versions.  Live, they seem a little more aggressive: the percussion is much more distinctive, and also fun to watch when different people would start pounding on drums.  And live, the electronics were less prominent, and the vocals less problematic (live vocals get a lot more leeway than vocals on tape).  So they were quite good.  I think they deserve their hype and some success, and hope they continue to play a lot and get more press.  </p>
<p>Imperial China: </p>
<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/vxsarin/4297270648/in/set-72157623141104421/"><img src="http://theobscurist.com/images/impchi1.jpg" alt="Imperial China" /></a></p>
<p>After Imperial China came <strong>Hume</strong>, who were clearly the most divisive band among my friends.  Actually, it was all my friends against me.  I really like Hume!  But all the friends I dragged along found them kind of boring pop music, and they kept saying the singing sounded just like <strong>Death Cab for Cutie</strong>.  But doesn&#8217;t everybody besides me like Death Cab?  Or <em>didn&#8217;t</em> they at one point?  This is confusing.  Maybe it also had something to do with singer/guitarist/mastermind Brit Powell&#8217;s perpetual grin.  Anyhow, I thought it was a very cool performance.  Hume remind me of other au courant bands like <strong>Real Estate</strong>, and it seems to me like they could ride the current &#8220;quirky beach pop&#8221; wave to some success if they wanted to.  They were the only band of the night that I could really see fitting into the mainstream indie world of hip mp3 blogs and profiles on NPR.  And sometimes that is ok.  I like pop music.</p>
<p>Hume:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/vxsarin/4296538083/in/set-72157623141104421/"><img src="http://theobscurist.com/images/hume1.jpg" alt="Hume" /></a></p>
<p>Finally, the headliners of the diverse night were the <strong>Cornel West Theory</strong>.  These guys were fun, but I think fatigue was setting in by that point, and I&#8217;m not sure they held the audience&#8217;s attention.  This was the first time I saw them and I thought they were good, with lots of different singers and rappers and guest musicians.  I mean, not exactly like a <strong>Thievery Corporation</strong> show, but it was good to see their ambition, and crossover appeal.  One wonders what their fanbase is like among DC&#8217;s hip-hop scene.  I enjoyed their show but was ready for the performance to be over by the time they were done.  It is a lot of work to try to pay attention to 5 performances in a row.</p>
<p>Cornel West Theory:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/vxsarin/4297297068/in/set-72157623141104421/"><img src="http://theobscurist.com/images/cwt.jpg" alt="Cornel West Theory" /></a></p>
<p>So overall &#8212; a resounding success.  But a wearying one!  Check out the Sockets website for <a href="http://socketsrecords.blogspot.com/2010/02/sockets-showcase-video-cornel-west.html">links</a> <a href="http://socketsrecords.blogspot.com/2010/01/sockets-showcase-audio-hume.html">to</a> <a href="http://socketsrecords.blogspot.com/2010/01/sockets-showcase-audio-buildings.html">some</a> <a href="http://socketsrecords.blogspot.com/2010/01/socktets-showcase-audio-imperial-china.html">audio</a> and video from the night.  Let&#8217;s hope for another one in a year or so&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://theobscurist.com/muzyka/2010/02/sockets-showcase-black-cat-12210/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sockets showcase tomorrow night!</title>
		<link>http://theobscurist.com/muzyka/2010/01/sockets-showcase/</link>
		<comments>http://theobscurist.com/muzyka/2010/01/sockets-showcase/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 22:15:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jeff gerhard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[previews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sockets]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theobscurist.com/muzyka/?p=226</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Although the dizzying changes in music fandom over the past decade have been overwhelmingly to the good, there are lots of things I miss about indie rock circa 1999. Some of the things I miss are probably shared by any music fan my age: I miss listening to full-length albums in depth, instead of sifting [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although the dizzying changes in music fandom over the past decade have been overwhelmingly to the good, there are lots of things I miss about indie rock circa 1999.  Some of the things I miss are probably shared by any music fan my age: I miss listening to full-length albums in depth, instead of sifting through thousands of mp3s; I miss record stores; blah blah blah.  This stuff has been re-hashed to death.  But living in Washington, DC, there is something I miss that probably not too many others do: a little record label called <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slowdime_Records">Slowdime</a>.  Slowdime put out a whole bunch of great albums by a diverse group of local musicians, the kind of records that weren&#8217;t really appropriate for the much-bigger Dischord, but records that deserved a chance and an audience.  Slowdime helped to document a surprisingly thriving local music scene, and I gradually started to trust the label as an arbiter of really great local music that might not exactly sell to a mass audience, but could help local music fans know what shows to go to, who to look out for.  Also, you could buy the CDs and feel like you were helping pay back the people in your own neighborhood who were working hard to support interesting and challenging artists.  It seemed like a pretty great feedback loop.</p>
<p>Slowdime slowly faded away in the early part of the &#8217;00s, and not-so-coincidentally, so did a lot of my interest in local bands and music.  There was still a lot of great music being made here, but when blogs took over from record labels as curators and promoters of talent, it felt like the music scene was all scattered and incoherent.  DC indie music seemed mediocre, at best; the good stuff was drowning in a blandly generic sea.  The giant of the independent music scene locally, Dischord, slowed down its work considerably (and understandably), and didn&#8217;t really dive into the new-media universe (again, understandably). A couple other local labels came and went.  Some interesting music websites have floated around.  Experimental music has had a kind of a coherent scene.  But for rock music, good rock music, things seemed kind of dead, and this was exacerbated by the collapse of the record industry.  It seemed like the whole idea of a small-time local record label was both quaint and quixotic, at least up until the past year or so when I started paying attention to <a href="http://socketsrecords.blogspot.com/">Sockets Records</a>.</p>
<p>Sockets has a diverse roster, but seems to focus on creative and interesting music, with an emphasis on DC.  The label isn&#8217;t new, but it has been actually gearing up its publicity and raising its public profile lately.  They&#8217;re trying to hype their bands; they use all the <del>idiotic</del> essential modern tools like blogs and facebooks; they seem to really want people to listen to the music they are pushing.  And luckily, they&#8217;re working with a lot of the best up-and-coming talent in the city.  Is Sockets the new Slowdime?  Not really &#8212; the world has changed too much in the past ten years.  But maybe Sockets can help use the idea of a record label in a new way to get people excited about the local scene.  It&#8217;s all about the branding, and I am already learning to trust anything that is Sockets-approved.</p>
<p>Tomorrow night they are having a showcase at the Black Cat that I highly recommend&#8230; I can also recommend the upcoming <strong>Imperial China</strong> album from Sockets, which I am about to post a review for.  Go to the showcase!  It is gonna be the musical event of the season, featuring <strong>Cornel West Theory, HUME, Imperial China, Buildings</strong>, and <strong>Big Gold Belt</strong>.  Info <a href="http://socketsrecords.blogspot.com/2009/12/announcing-january-22-black-cat-sockets.html">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://theobscurist.com/muzyka/2010/01/sockets-showcase/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

